Chess in Small Doses
A blog about the (mostly) harmless pursuit of chess improvement as an adult
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Aug 21, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 16, 2026
Latest issues
The One Rule to Rule Them All (opens the original)
Read excerpt
(TL; DR - In this post I’m breaking down the blunder check and how I’ve made it simpler)Welcome back to Chess in Small Doses, a Substack about adult improvement in chess. Today I’m talking about my struggles with blunders. Everyone knows that we need to perform a blunder check before we move. However many improvers, myself included, struggle to consistently do it. Every time someone tells me I need to perform a blunder check I think of Dwight from The Office.Whenever I’m about to do something I
What I Wish I'd Known (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Welcome back to Chess in Small Doses, a Substack about adult improvement in chess. Today I’m looking back to see what (if anything) I would have done differently knowing what I know now. There’s actually a lot. What I wish I’d known back then turns out to be a framework for adult improvement at almost anything. What is so hard about chess improvement is that many of the most effective steps are almost the opposite of what adults are naturally inclined to do. Disappointing in one sense, but uplif
1500 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="889" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!TgwV!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1701e720-d69c-4531-94cb-5552310e0475_1736x1060.pn
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.