Changing language in the #climatecrisis
How the climatecrisis is changing language, and how we can change language to fight for climate
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Sep 6, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 5, 2026
Latest issues
Our metaphorical climates (opens the original)
Read excerpt
English speakers have been using the term ‘climate’ metaphorically for over 350 years. Within 100 years of climate coming to mean ‘prevailing weather conditions’, the word comes to be used figuratively for the idea of collective shared attitudes or opinions among a community or nation.<div class="
One sticky, misleading turn of phrase (opens the original)
Read excerpt
They’re good at what they do, no doubt about it. Scientists are not trained in rhetoric or propaganda. The strength and the consistency and the repetitive of the messaging was so strong. This is a quote from a climate scientist who we can now say, thanks to a newly crafted verb for the ages, got well and truly ‘murdoched’.<a class="image-link image2 is-viewable-img" href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Rhla!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.am
Big fossil's war on our hearts and minds (opens the original)
Read excerpt
I wrote a piece a few months back wondering why our putatively progressive Federal government has done no sustained campaigning on linking fossil fuels to climate breakdown. I linked to a recent report by the Australian Security Leaders Climate Group which wrote:anti-climate-action propaganda and disinformation networks have grown into multibillion dollar permanent campaigns, largely funded by fossil-fuel interests and their all
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.