Brazilianing - Brazilian Portuguese
Welcome to Brazilianing, a podcast made for those who want to learn or improve their Brazilian Portuguese.Oi, I’m Dani, Brazilian Portuguese teacher and I believe that learning Portuguese doesn't have to be difficult or boring.Connect with Brazil, your family and friends and…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Aug 31, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 3, 2026
Latest episodes
#115 The mistakes that keep you from speaking Portuguese (even after years of study) (opens the original)
Read excerpt
You’ve been studying Portuguese for months—or perhaps years—and you’ve tried apps, taken courses, learned grammar rules, built a substantial vocabulary, and even understand most of what you hear... but when the moment comes to speak, you freeze up. Unfortunately, this happens to many students of Brazilian Portuguese.Today, I’m going to show you exactly why this happens and, most importantly, how to fix it so you can finally speak more naturally and without freezing. 📌 Download the free transcrip
#114 PODER vs CONSEGUIR - How to use these verbs correctly (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Have you ever been confused when trying to use the words PODER and CONSEGUIR?This happens because these two words have the same meaning when translated into English.But the reality is that in Portuguese these verbs have DIFFERENT meanings and uses.So today I'm going to explain the differences between the words PODER and CONSEGUIR, with examples of how they are used by Brazilians. If you've ever been unsure about these two words, stay until the end of the video to understand. 📌 Download the free
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.