Better Eyesight Podcast
Dr. William H. Bates, the holistic ophthalmologist who pioneered the field of natural vision improvement, published a monthly magazine called Better Eyesight Magazine from July 1919 to June 1930.Now, a century later, a group of natural vision educators and Bates Method…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 1, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 1, 2026
Latest episodes
087: September 1926 with Nathan Oxenfeld and Ainhoa de Federico (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In the eighty-seventh episode of the Better Eyesight Podcast, Nathan Oxenfeld and Dr. Ainhoa de Federico read through the eighty-seventh Better Eyesight magazine that was originally published in September 1926 by Dr. William H. Bates and his team. Exactly one hundred years later, these two natural vision teachers breathe life back into the words of Dr. Bates, and also provide some modern commentary on the topics brought up in each article. Better Eyesight, September 1926 A monthly magazine devot
086: August 1926 with Nathan Oxenfeld and Sigita Labutienė (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In the eighty-sixth episode of the Better Eyesight Podcast, Nathan Oxenfeld and Sigita Labutienė read through the eighty-sixth Better Eyesight magazine that was originally published in August 1926 by Dr. William H. Bates and his team. Exactly one hundred years later, these two natural vision teachers breathe life back into the words of Dr. Bates, and also provide some modern commentary on the topics brought up in each article. Better Eyesight, August 1926 A monthly magazine devoted to the preven
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.