HeyJaredAwesome Code Reviews
Best practices and research behind making code reviews your superpower.
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Aug 14, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 7, 2026
Latest issues
Rethinking Code Review for Agentic Development (opens the original)
Read excerpt
I have been thinking a lot about what code review should look like when coding agents take over a substantial part of implementation.<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="1107" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!DRQa!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,
A new course: Code Reviews in the AI Era (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hi everyone,Over the last half-year, I have become deeply involved in code review research again. I have studied code review for many years, but agentic programming is changing some of its underlying assumptions. Code can now be produced at a speed and volume that was previously impossible, while the human capacity to understand, verify, and take responsibility for it has not increased at the same rate.This raises questions that I find genuinely fascinating: Which parts of traditional code revie
When Agentic Coding Breaks Code Review (opens the original)
Read excerpt
I’ve been working with developers and organizations to improve their code review practices for over 10 years now. In a new post, I share two phenomena I see emerging with the increased use of agentic programming: code review surrender and code review exploitation.Code review surrender is a capacity failure. Reviewers still believe review matters, but cannot keep up with the growing volume, pace, and cognitive demands of agentic code changes. Reviews become delayed, superficial, skipped, or quiet
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.