HeyJared9/11 Planes Research
An Independent Investigation into the four "alleged" plane crashes on 9/11
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 8
- Latest publication
- Sep 11, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 3, 2026
Latest issues
September 11th 2001: A Pause For Reflection (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Today marks the 25th Anniversary of the September 11th 2001, a very dark day in US history. Like the JFK assassination, 9/11 has slipped into the pages of history. As with the JFK assassination the official narrative of 9/11 is a lie. It was also an attack on human consciousness. Over the 25 years since that dark day, the cover-up had already began. An element of the cover-up was the setting-up of the 9/11 Truth Movement, a movement that “moved” the truth farther away from discovering the truth.
New DCC Radar Analysis Proves United 93 Landed at Reagan Airport at 10:28 a.m. on 9/11 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In my United 93 article, originally published in 2020, I have presented official evidence that United 93 (UAL 93) landed at Reagan National Airport at 10:28 a.m. To briefly recap, below is a Flight Aware screen-shot regarding UAL 93’s landing at Reagan National Airport at 10:28 a.m. <a class="image-link image2 is-viewable-img" href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!g0Xg!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2F
I Questioned the Author of “Manual or Automated?” — Did He Answer the Questions? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Following-on from my two previous articles, whereby I raised serious questions about a study published May 2026 by the The International Center For 9/11 Justice called Manual or Automated? A Flight Simulation Study and Analysis of Reported Aircraft Maneuvers on September 11, 2001, authored by Dr. Piers Robinson.<a class="image-link image2 is-viewable-img" href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!1g4u!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-pos
A Forensic, Page-by-Page Critique of the Manual or Automated? A Flight Simulation Study and Analysis of Reported Aircraft Maneuvers on September 11, 2001. (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Following-on from my previous article, Why the “Manual or Automated?” Study Is Fundamentally Flawed, I decided to deploy ChatGPT to conduct a full forensic, page-by-page critique of the 51 page Manual or Automated study, produced by Dr. Piers Robinson, in May 2026.<a class="image-link image2 is-viewable-img" href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!1g4u!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:stee
Why the “Manual or Automated?” Study Is Fundamentally Flawed (opens the original)
Read excerpt
What if the central experiment in a study claiming to distinguish “manual” from “automated” flight never actually tested the aircraft it was supposed to investigate?In May 2026, The International Center For 9/11 Justice published a study it conducted called Manual or Automated? A Flight Simulation Study and Analysis of Reported Aircraft Maneuvers on September 11, 2001, Which was authored by Dr. Piers Robinson. <a class="image-link image2 is-viewable-img" href="https:
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.