3ookReview
3ook.com 第3代電子書店,滙聚讀者、作者、書店與出版社,共同策展、發布與銷售多元書籍及刊物,運用 AI 及 Web3 技術,保育文化,守護歷史。
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 12
- Latest publication
- Sep 28, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 21, 2026
Latest issues
拆解周星馳的無厘頭電影(上) (opens the original)
Read excerpt
<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="1122" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!vf-c!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F719e985a-229e-4d2c-bc1a-318847e97d77_1402x1122.p
再訪馬屎埔 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="1092" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!oHvp!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1bffdc7f-6058-4f68-ab0a-d4717a5f878f_1600x1200.
一本書上架之後,除了購買,是否還有更多可能?出版業心中的閱讀烏托邦 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="910" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!75m5!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F80595639-5c16-48c4-a19e-2df120ed9d2b_1600x1000.j
今晚的社群例會 ——《活躍在社媒的人會讀書嗎?》ft. 好青年荼毒室 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
上個月我們和內容創作者 Rachel 聊了「流量換得到書量嗎?」,發現觀眾投入的其實是對創作者本身的信任,書只是載體。今個月,我們想繼續探討:文人和活躍社媒,兩者是否沒有衝突?
《腳下魔法 愛恨南歐》—— 巴塞隆拿「人民不會忘記」的重量 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="1092" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!-O0j!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc1037bae-e085-47de-8c57-9a29746fe28c_2048x1536.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.